Discretization of Junction of two pipes (Fig. 3) is
presented as the last example. It is a complex example consisting of
120 vertices, 328 curves, 253 surfaces and 58 regions.
Again, two truly 3D meshes of different
densities have been generated. The coarser one containing 61947 nodes
and 54932 elements has been generated using from 1 to 6 processors on SP2
and from 3 to 12 processors on Paramid. The finer mesh consists of
92707 nodes and 110986 elements and has been obtained using from 1 to 8
processors on SP2 and from 6 to 15 processors on Paramid. Although
this object is very suitable for parallel discretization using even
higher number of processors it was impossible to do that because of
temporary lack of resources. The speedup
obtained on SP2 machine is drawn in Figure 6 and the time, speedup and
efficiency are summarized in Tables 5 and
6. The results achieved on Paramid
machine are presented in Figure 9 and in
Tables 11 and
12. Again, accurate quantitative comparison of the results
is not possible because of indirectly calculated speedups on
Paramid. However, also in this example the speedups achieved on
SP2 and Paramid exhibit similar profile. A distinct difference may be again
observed in the phase of saturation of the speedup which occurs
significantly earlier in the case of SP2.
Daniel Rypl
2005-12-03